Sharing on KM & PMPosts RSS Comments RSS

Archive for the 'Psychology' Category

How to Disagree

How to Disagree

The web is turning writing into a conversation. Twenty years ago, writers wrote and readers read. The web lets readers respond, and increasingly they do—in comment threads, on forums, and in their own blog posts.

Many who respond to something disagree with it. That’s to be expected. Agreeing tends to motivate people less than disagreeing. And when you agree there’s less to say. You could expand on something the author said, but he has probably already explored the most interesting implications. When you disagree you’re entering territory he may not have explored.

The result is there’s a lot more disagreeing going on, especially measured by the word. That doesn’t mean people are getting angrier. The structural change in the way we communicate is enough to account for it. But though it’s not anger that’s driving the increase in disagreement, there’s a danger that the increase in disagreement will make people angrier. Particularly online, where it’s easy to say things you’d never say face to face.

Paul Ghaham wrote this excelent essay

No responses yet

Emotional Truth: The Search Starts Here

PsyBlog: Psychology Blog: Emotional Truth: The Search Starts Here

“A thought comes when it will, not when I will.” - Nietzsche, quoted in Solomon (2003).

Nietzsche’s quote raises an important question about both thoughts and, implicitly, about emotions. Many people would say their emotions only come when they will and not when they want. So how do thoughts and emotions interact in everyday life and in therapeutic processes like cognitive behavioural therapy? Do we really have any control over our emotions or are they things that just happen to us?

First on PsyBlog: Psychology Blog.

No responses yet

Hacking the Human OS

Communication Nation: Hacking the Human OS

Hacking the Human OS is a series of posts that investigates the mechanics of the human mind. Understanding your Operating System (OS) will help you think better, and help you get better, more consistent results from your interactions with other people.

No responses yet

Talento, estado anormal de la mente?

LANACION.com

Un amigo, Martín Candurra, comparte conmigo este articulo de Lanacion.com donde se reflexiona sobre la busqueda de talentos.

Cito del articulo:

Jocho Yamamoto, fue un samurái que vivió entre los siglos XVII y XVIII y que pensaba que o son posibles las hazañas humanas, a menos que quienes las realicen se encuentren afectados por un estado anormal de la mente. Traducido a nuestro lenguaje cotidiano, hay que estar muy loco para realizar verdaderos hechos excepcionales. ¿Serán estos los locos a quienes se les llama “talentos” y se los busca afanosamente?

A proposito de esta reflexión, Martín es un talento que tuve la oportunidad de reclutar para un proyecto complejo y que quizas podamos considerar una hazaña tecnica, en el cual tuvo una actuación destacada.

Solo basto una entrevista para “intuir” que habia talento y una “corazonada” para saber que lo queria en nuestro equipo.

One response so far

Do You Have a Type A Personality?

I Have A Type A- Personality!, How are Type A personalty people?

They are one of the most balanced people around, motivated and focused, they are good at getting what they want.

They rule at success, but success doesn’t rule them. When it’s playtime, they really know how to kick back, Whether it’s hanging out with friends or doing something they love!, They live life to the fullest - encorporating the best of both worlds

Do You Have a Type A Personality?
http://www.blogthings.com/doyouhaveatypeapersonalityquiz/

No responses yet

On the reality of the other person

The reality of the other person lies not in what He reveals to you but in what He cannot reveal to you. Therefore, if you would understand Him, listen not to what He says but rather to what He does not say.

Kahlil Gibran
(1883-1931) Lebanese-American Poet Philosopher & Artist

Source: Gurteen Knowledge Quote

No responses yet

What Are The Key Traits Of Ideal Online Collaborators?

Online Collaboration: What Are The Key Traits Of Ideal Online Collaborators? - Online Collaboration and Web Conferencing Breaking News - Kolabora.com

A recent survey conducted jointly by Mitch Ditkoff and Tim Moore of Idea Champions, Carolyn Allen of Innovation Solution Center and Dave Pollard of Meeting of Minds reveals that most people would rather have inexperienced people with a positive attitude than highly experienced people who lack enthusiasm, candor or commitment, on a collaborative work team.

No responses yet

On the development of character

Character cannot be developed in ease and quiet. Only through experience of trial and suffering can the soul be strengthened, vision cleared, ambition inspired, and success achieved.

Helen Keller
(1880 - 1968) American Blind/Deaf Author & Lecturer

Source: Gurteen Knowledge Quote

No responses yet

The Art of Work

The Art of Work

What would happen if the best moments of your life happened at the office? That would be “flow,” and thanks to a guy with an unpronounceable name, more and more businesses want to know about it.

No responses yet

On being open

By their openness, people dedicated to the truth live in the open, and through the exercise of their courage to live in the open, they become free from fear.


M. Scott Peck
Psychiatrist & author
The Road Less Travelled

Source: Gurteen Knowledge Quote

No responses yet

On problems

Problems only exist in the human mind.

Anthony de Mello
(1931-1987) Jesuit Priest

No responses yet

How bosses reveal their attitudes towards employees

elearningpost

The behavior of bosses towards perceived underperforming employees can have a long lasting affect on them.

No responses yet

Creative Solutions, Critical Skills

How to Save the World

People change slowly. They change because they have to, more often than because they want to. And they change their behaviours before they change their beliefs.

Nowhere is this more manifest than in business. And most large organizations have a large number of people, and so, like oil tankers, they change direction the slowest of all, and are the least agile and manoeuvrable.

Change gurus and consultants have, over the years, pushed three ways to bring about change in organizations.

The first way is by changing or imposing tools and technologies that enable, or strait-jacket, employees. A software program that requires you to complete credit check information on a new customer before you can open up a customer ID and sell to that customer is one example. New skills and competencies, both technical and ’soft’ skills like time management, can also be considered ‘tools’ of the trade. The difference between a skill and a competency is that a competency is an applied skill — the competency to innovate, for example, is an application of several skills, notably creative skills.

The second way is by changing or imposing work processes and methodologies. The new regulations under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, for example, have imposed mandatory new processes on both managers and auditors of public corporations.

The third way is by changing the culture of the organization by using ‘internal marketing’, by leadership style, through performance management and through reward and recognition programs.

In the past generation, all three methods have been, and continue to be, used in most organizations, particularly the larger ones which are inherently harder to change….

I would argue then that, particularly as it gets larger, the only way in which an organization can effectively differentiate itself or outperform its competition, is by helping its employees to work smarter. And the best ways to do that are to equip those employees with critical skills and competencies, and empower them to leverage those skills and competencies to give back to the organization creative solutions to its particular, and evolving problems. The power of many.

Please read the full article of Dave Pollard, it is excelent!

No responses yet

Relationship is a Mirror

“Self-knowledge is not according to any formula.

You may go to a psychologist or a psychoanalyst to find out about yourself, but that is not self-knowledge. Self-knowledge comes into being when we are aware of ourselves in relationship, which shows what we are from moment to moment.

Relationship is a mirror in which to see ourselves as we actually are. But most of us are incapable of looking at ourselves as we are in relationship, because we immediately begin to condemn or justify what we see. We judge, we evaluate, we compare, we deny or accept, but we never observe actually what is, and for most people this seems to be the most difficult thing to do; yet this alone is the beginning of self-knowledge.

If one is able to see oneself as one is in this extraordinary mirror of relationship, which does not distort, if one can just look into this mirror with full attention and see actually what is, be aware of it without condemnation, without judgment, without evaluation - and one does this when there is earnest interest - then one will find that the mind is capable of freeing itself from all conditioning; and it is only then that the mind is free to discover that which lies beyond the field of thought.”

- J. Krishnamurti

No responses yet

WHAT ARE YOU TELLING ME?

How to Save the World

Body language, speech, behaviour tells may give away your intentions, fears or state of mind.

Source: How to Save the World

No responses yet

Skills are Only Half the Equation for Success

StickyMinds.com : Column info : Skills are Only Half the Equation for Success
Managers work hard to hire the right people for the job. Yet sometimes, the work doesn’t go as well as we think it should. Was it a bad hire? Has the person developed a bad attitude? Maybe, but before you jump to conclusions, look at the other half of the performance equation.

Source: StickyMinds.com

No responses yet

HBS Working Knowledge: Career Effectiveness: Leveraging Your Team’s Interpersonal Skills

HBS Working Knowledge: Career Effectiveness: Leveraging Your Team’s Interpersonal Skills

What does it really mean to be good with people? This Harvard Business Review excerpt examines the “relational” aspect of business.

No responses yet

Cost of Distrust

Individuals in higher-trust societies spend less to protect themselves from being exploited in economic transactions. Trust is an economical substitute for extensive contracts, litigation, and monitoring in transactions and thus economizes on transaction costs.

This quote taken from this paper, published by IBM, explain models of trust and reputation systems, Experimental Games for the design of reputation management systems

One response so far

Funless Professionals

Physiologically people are unable to sustain trust of each other without fun or at least contextually relevant happiness.
I agree that the problem comes when someone is an expert in jolly without being deeply caring and cogniscent of the community context, but fun like innovation, courage and love of people focusing on context is being thrown out of organisations by managers whose tangible measurements have no understanding of goodwill as the quality system communalising people relationships. Such funless professionals are destroying the systemic relationships that sustain an organisation’s wealth producing capabilities.

Chris Macrae - www.valuetrue.com

No responses yet

Tres juegos online como terapia para elevar la autoestima

Clarín.com - Weblogs - Tres juegos online como terapia para elevar la autoestima

Si el diagnostico es autoestima baja, podes usar la terapia online de la U. McGill en Canada, para mejorarla.

Si bien no reemplaza a un buen analista, ayuda y abre un camino interesante en el desarrollo de herramientas que soporten en forma online un tratamiento tradicional.

4 responses so far

Next »